30 C.F.R. § 845.14

Determination of amount of penalty

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Office shall determine the amount of any civil penalty by converting the total number of points assigned under 30 CFR 845.13 to a dollar amount, according to the following schedule:

Table 1 to § 845.14
Points	Dollars
1	84
2	168
3	252
4	335
5	421
6	504
7	588
8	668
9	755
10	840
11	922
12	1,008
13	1,089
14	1,175
15	1,262
16	1,343
17	1,427
18	1,513
19	1,595
20	1,679
21	1,765
22	1,848
23	1,931
24	2,014
25	2,098
26	2,519
27	2,938
28	3,356
29	3,619
30	4,197
31	4,616
32	5,038
33	5,457
34	5,878
35	6,296
36	6,717
37	7,137
38	7,556
39	7,975
40	8,395
41	8,817
42	9,236
43	9,652
44	10,074
45	10,494
46	10,914
47	11,333
48	11,755
49	12,172
50	12,592
51	13,010
52	13,433
53	13,853
54	14,273
55	14,694
56	15,113
57	15,530
58	15,950
59	16,372
60	16,790
61	17,210
62	17,629
63	18,050
64	18,470
65	18,888
66	19,310
67	19,730
68	20,147
69	20,568
70	20,988

[47 FR 35640, Aug. 16, 1982, as amended at 62 FR 63276, Nov. 28, 1997; 66 FR 58647, Nov. 21, 2001; 70 FR 70701, Nov. 22, 2005; 74 FR 34493, July 15, 2009; 79 FR 18447, Apr. 2, 2014; 81 FR 44541, July 8, 2016; 82 FR 9354, Feb. 6, 2017; 83 FR 10616, Mar. 12, 2018; 84 FR 10676, Mar. 22, 2019; 85 FR 20835, Apr. 15, 2020; 86 FR 29514, June 2, 2021; 87 FR 15886, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 24336, Apr. 20, 2023; 89 FR 23911, Apr. 5, 2024; 90 FR 23442, June 3, 2025]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1992–1992 · leading case: Nat'l Coal Ass'n & Am. Mining Cong. v. Manuel Lujan, Jr., Sec'y of the Interior, 979 F.2d 1548 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nat'l Coal Ass'n & Am. Mining Cong. v. Manuel Lujan, Jr., Sec'y of the Interior, 979 F.2d 1548 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “See 30 C.F.R. § 845.14 (penalty table). Upon finding that a penalty is in order, OSMRE sends the permittee a “proposed assessment”; within 30 days of receipt of OSMRE's proposal, the permittee may request an “assessment conference” to review the proposal, informally, with an…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.