30 C.F.R. § 948.16

Required regulatory program amendments

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17, West Virginia is required to submit the following proposed program amendments by the dates specified:

(a)-(rrrrr) [Reserved]

[50 FR 28324, July 11, 1985 and 50 FR 38652, Sept. 24, 1985] Editorial Note:For Federal Register citations affecting § 948.16, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at www.govinfo.gov.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1996–2003 · leading case: Cat Run Coal Co. v. Babbitt, 932 F. Supp. 772 (S.D.W. Va 1996).
Cat Run Coal Co. v. Babbitt, 932 F. Supp. 772 (S.D.W. Va 1996). · cites it 3× “15 (k)(8) (1994); (2) directed WVDEP to adopt a regulation making WVDEP's use of the bond pool mandatory, 30 C.F.R. § 948.16 (p) (1990) and 53 Fed.”
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. Norton, 190 F. Supp. 2d 859 (S.D.W. Va 2002). · cites it 3× “In a sworn declaration accompanying the Federal Defendants’ response to the Conservancy’s motion for summary judgment, Glenda Owens, Acting Director of OSM, averred: “No later than May 28, 2002, sixty days after the close of the comment period, OSM will determine whether the…”
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. Norton, 137 F. Supp. 2d 687 (S.D.W. Va 2001). · cites it 2× “16CÜÍ); 2) remove the state law provision that allows collection of the special reclamation tax only when the special reclamation fund’s liabilities exceed its assets, 30 C.F.R. § 948.16 (kkk); and 3) eliminate the deficit in the State’s alternative bonding system and ensure…”
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. Norton, 161 F. Supp. 2d 676 (S.D.W. Va 2001). “” 30 C.F.R. § 948.16 (111); 60 Fed.Reg. at 51918.”
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. Norton, 238 F. Supp. 2d 761 (S.D.W. Va 2003). · cites it 7× “” 30 C.F.R. § 948.16 (111) (emphasis added).”
— 30 C.F.R. § 948.16(111) — 1 case
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. Norton, 238 F. Supp. 2d 761 (S.D.W. Va 2003). “” 30 C.F.R. § 948.16 (111) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.