31 C.F.R. § 100.11

]Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: Portland Mint v. United States, 102 F.4th 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2024).
Portland Mint v. United States, 102 F.4th 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2024). · cites it 10× “Mint”) pursuant to a regulation, 31 C.F.R. § 100.11 , that provided for redemption of mutilated coins.”
Portland Mint v. United States, No. 20-518 (Fed. Cl. June 28, 2022). · cites it 41× “make payments pursuant to the Redemption Program established in 31 C.F.R. § 100.11 ; (2) a breach of an implied-in-fact contract between plaintiff and the United States Mint (U.”
Portland Mint v. United States, No. 22-2154 (Fed. Cir. May 30, 2024). · cites it 10× “Mint”) pursuant to a regulation, 31 C.F.R. § 100.11 , that provided for redemption of mutilated coins.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.