C.F.R. » Title 31 » CHAPTER V—OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 515—CUBAN ASSETS CONTROL REGULATIONS › Subpart C—General Definitions

31 C.F.R. § 515.329

Person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; person subject to U.S. jurisdiction

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The terms person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and person subject to U.S. jurisdiction include:

(a) Any individual, wherever located, who is a citizen or resident of the United States;

(b) Any person within the United States as defined in § 515.330;

(c) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization organized under the laws of the United States or of any State, territory, possession, or district of the United States; and

(d) Any corporation, partnership, association, or other organization, wherever organized or doing business, that is owned or controlled by persons specified in paragraphs (a) or (c) of this section.

[50 FR 27437, July 3, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 14145, Mar. 24, 2003; 80 FR 2292, Jan. 16, 2015; 81 FR 13991, Mar. 16, 2016]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–2013 · leading case: United States v. Stefan E. Brodie, 403 F.3d 123 (3rd Cir. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Stefan E. Brodie, 403 F.3d 123 (3rd Cir. 2005). · cites it 5× “329, 31 C.F.R. § 515.329 , which provided, at the time the conspiracy charged in this case was allegedly in effect: The term ‘person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States’ includes: (a) Any individual, wherever located, who is a citizen or resident of the United…”
Odebrecht Constr., Inc. v. Sec'y, Florida Dep't of Transp., 715 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “31 C.F.R. § 515.329 . There is nothing in this record to suggest that Odebrecht has run afoul of the CACR, because neither it nor any of its subsidiaries does any business with Cuba.”
Glen v. Club Méditerranée S.A., 365 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (S.D. Fla. 2005). “31 C.F.R. § 515.329 ; Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relation Law of the United States § 414 (1981).”
Constr. Exporting Enter., UNECA v. Nikki Mar. Ltd., 558 F. Supp. 1372 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). “See 31 C.F.R. § 515.329 . Whether Nikki Maritime Ltd.”
United States v. Brodie (3rd Cir. 2005). · cites it 5× “329, 31 C.F.R. § 515.329 , which provided, at the time the conspiracy charged in this case was allegedly in effect: 31 C.”
United States v. Christopher Plummer, 221 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2000). “” 31 C.F.R. § 515.329 . 6 Count II expressly alleges the elements of a violation of these provisions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.