C.F.R. » Title 32 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE › SUBCHAPTER H—CLOSURES AND REALIGNMENT › PART 174—REVITALIZING BASE CLOSURE COMMUNITIES AND ADDRESSING IMPACTS OF REALIGNMENT › Subpart A—General

32 C.F.R. § 174.3

Definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Base closure law. This term has the same meaning as provided in 10 U.S.C. § 101(a)(17)(B) and (C).

(b) Closure. An action that ceases or relocates all current missions of an installation and eliminates or relocates all current personnel positions (military, civilian, and contractor), except for personnel required for caretaking, conducting any ongoing environmental cleanup, or property disposal. Retention of a small enclave, not associated with the main mission of the base, is still a closure.

(c) Consultation. Explaining and discussing an issue, considering objections, modifications, and alternatives; but without a requirement to reach agreement.

(d) Date of approval. This term has the same meaning as provided in section 2910(8) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-510.

(e) Excess property. This term has the same meaning as provided in 40 U.S.C. § 102(3).

(f) Installation. This term has the same meaning as provided in the definition for “military installation” in section 2910(4) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-510.

(g) Local Redevelopment Authority (LRA). This term has the same meaning as provided in the definition for “redevelopment authority” in section 2910(9) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-510.

(h) Military Department. This term has the same meaning as provided in 10 U.S.C. 101(a)(8).

(i) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Pub. L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., as amended.

(j) Realignment. This term has the same meaning as provided in section 2910(5) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101-510.

(k) Secretary concerned. This term has the same meaning as provided in 10 U.S.C. 101(a)(9)(A), (B), and (C).

(l) Surplus property. This term has the same meaning as provided in 40 U.S.C. 102(10).

(m) Transition coordinator. This term has the same meaning as used in section 2915 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, Public Law 103-160.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1971–2010 · leading case: Magnolia Neighborhood Plan. Council v. City of Seattle, 230 P.3d 190 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Magnolia Neighborhood Plan. Council v. City of Seattle, 230 P.3d 190 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “¶32 We affirm the trial court’s order on the applicability of SEPA, reverse the trial court’s order requiring the City to publicly determine the applicability of the DP Master Plan, and deny Magnolia’s request for attorney fees.”
Magnolia Neighborhood v. City of Seattle, 230 P.3d 190 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “¶ 32 We affirm the trial court's order on the applicability of SEPA, reverse the trial court's order requiring the City to publicly determine the applicability of the DP Master Plan, and deny Magnolia's request for attorney fees.”
Buck Kreihs Co. v. United States, 331 F. Supp. 1173 (E.D. La. 1971). “) 32 C.F.R. 174.3(e) provides in part: Merchant ships activated from the Nátional Defense Reserve Fleet to meet emergency needs are placed under MSTS operational control by means of U.”
— 32 C.F.R. § 174.3(e) — 1 case
Buck Kreihs Co. v. United States, 331 F. Supp. 1173 (E.D. La. 1971). “) 32 C.F.R. 174.3(e) provides in part: Merchant ships activated from the Nátional Defense Reserve Fleet to meet emergency needs are placed under MSTS operational control by means of U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.