32 C.F.R. § 260.4

Policy

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

It is DoD policy that a DoD Component having accountability for real property shall extend priority on such property to the blind when implementing the Randolph-Sheppard Act, as set out in the following paragraphs:

(a) The blind shall be given priority in the establishment and operation of vending facilities.

(b) The blind shall be given priority in the award of contracts to operate cafeterias.

(c) In conjunction with acquisition or substantial alteration or renovation of a building, satisfactory sites shall be provided for operation of blind vending facilities.

(d) Specified income from vending machines operated on DoD-controlled property by a DoD Component either directly or by contract shall be given to State licensing agencies.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1984–2006 · leading case: Tamashiro v. Dep't of Human Servs., 146 P.3d 103 (Haw. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Tamashiro v. Dep't of Human Servs., 146 P.3d 103 (Haw. 2006). · cites it 2× “, the parent Defense Department association at a major federal space installation demanded blind vendors give a portion of their income to the association; and the Department of Defense regulations, 32 C.F.R. § 260.4 (b)(3)(ii) (1966), provided that no permits would be granted…”

Southfork Sys., Inc. v. The United States, & State of Texas, Acting Through the Texas Comm'n for the Blind, 141 F.3d 1124 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “” 32 C.F.R. § 260.4 (c)(4). DOD’s regulations further provide that “[i]f the State licensing agency submits a proposal and it is within the competitive range established by the contracting officer, the contract will be awarded to the State licensing agency” unless “the on-site…”

Texas State Comm'n v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 730 (Ct. Cl. 1984). · cites it 2× “32 C.F.R. § 260.4 (b)(3)(ii) (1966). 7 The 1974 legislation created a “priority” for blind vendors in establishing and operating vending facilities on federally-controlled property.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.