32 C.F.R. § 536.42
Constitutional torts
A claim for violation of the U.S. Constitution does not constitute a state tort and is not cognizable under any subpart. A constitutional claim will be scrutinized in order to determine whether it is totally or partially payable as a state tort. For example, a Fifth Amendment taking may be payable in an altered form as a real estate claim. For further discussion see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-36.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Donald Vance v. Donald Rumsfeld, 701 F.3d 193 (7th Cir. 2012).
Donald Vance v. Donald Rumsfeld, 701 F.3d 193 (7th Cir. 2012). “32 C.F.R. § 536.42 . Nor do they apply to intentional torts, including assault, battery, and false imprisonment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.