C.F.R. » Title 32 » CHAPTER V—DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY › SUBCHAPTER I—LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS › PART 634—MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC SUPERVISION › Subpart A—Introduction

32 C.F.R. § 634.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This subpart establishes policy, responsibilities, and procedures for motor vehicle traffic supervision on military installations in the continental United States (CONUS) and overseas areas. This includes but is not limited to the following:

(1) Granting, suspending, or revoking the privilege to operate a privately owned vehicle (POV).

(2) Registration of POVs.

(3) Administration of vehicle registration and driver performance records.

(4) Driver improvement programs.

(5) Police traffic supervision.

(6) Off-installation traffic activities.

(b) Commanders in overseas areas are authorized to modify these policies and procedures in the following instances:

(1) When dictated by host nation relationships, treaties, and agreements.

(2) When traffic operations under military supervision necessitate measures to safeguard and protect the morale, discipline, and good order in the Services.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1989–2007 · leading case: United States v. Caine, 517 F. Supp. 2d 586 (D. Mass. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Caine, 517 F. Supp. 2d 586 (D. Mass. 2007). “” 32 C.F.R. § 634.1 (a). The Defendant was arrested for a traffic violation on National Park Service land (albeit property named the Charlestown Navy Yard), 4 which is governed by 36 C.”
United States v. Sauls, 981 F. Supp. 909 (D. Maryland 1997). “10 is presumptive evidence of impairment, and a blood alcohol concentration of .10 or more indicates intoxication.”
United States v. Carlson, 714 F. Supp. 428 (D. Haw. 1989). “See also 32 C.F.R. § 634.1 (e)(3)(i). As part of their exercise of authority, installation commanders are to develop traffic circulation plans which incorporate “[jjudicious use of uniform traffic control signs and devices.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.