32 C.F.R. § 70.6
Information requirements
(a) Reporting requirements. (1) The reporting requirement prescribed in § 70.8(n) is assigned Report Control Symbol DD-M(SA)1489.
(2) All reports must be consistent with DoD Directive 5000.11, “Data Elements and Data Codes Standardization Program,” December 7, 1964.
(b) Use of standard data elements. The data requirements prescribed by this part shall be consistent with DoD 5000.12-M, “DoD Manual for Standard Data Elements,” December 1981. Any reference to a date should appear as (YYMMDD), while any name entry should appear as (Last name, first name, middle initial).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1979–1983 · leading case: Robert A. Walters v. Sec'y of Def., 725 F.2d 107 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
Robert A. Walters v. Sec'y of Def., 725 F.2d 107 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “32 C.F.R. § 70.6 (c)(i), (ii) (1982). In Giles, supra, the recipient of an administrative general discharge from the Army based on a compulsory urine sample, sought an upgrading to an honorable discharge from the district court.”
Walters v. Sec'y of Def., 533 F. Supp. 1068 (D.D.C. 1982). “However, because both the plaintiff and defendants agree that the current regulation ( 32 C.F.R. § 70.6 (c)(l)(ii) (1981)) requires an upgrading in Walters’ case, and because the Court’s reading of the regulations leads to the same conclusion, the inadequacy of the affidavit is…”
United States v. Anthony Delutro, 617 F.2d 316 (2d Cir. 1980). “32 C.F.R. § 70.6 (1978). The Board must set forth a statement of its findings, conclusions and the reasons for the actions taken.”
Antonio A. Giles, Jr. v. Sec'y of the Army, 627 F.2d 554 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “See 32 C.F.R., Part 70.6(c) (1979). 4 . At the time Giles and the class members were discharged, individuals separated administratively could receive one of three types of discharge certificates: honorable; general, under honorable conditions; or undesirable.”
Nat'l Ass'n of Concerned Vets. v. Sec'y of Def., 487 F. Supp. 192 (D.D.C. 1979). “Yet, as with Annex D, the Navy DRB appears to follow 32 C.F.R. § 70.6 (c)(1) (1978) and rely on these guidelines in determining whether to recharacterize a veteran’s discharge.”
— 32 C.F.R. § 70.6(c) — 1 case
Antonio A. Giles, Jr. v. Sec'y of the Army, 627 F.2d 554 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “See 32 C.F.R., Part 70.6(c) (1979). 4 . At the time Giles and the class members were discharged, individuals separated administratively could receive one of three types of discharge certificates: honorable; general, under honorable conditions; or undesirable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.