C.F.R. » Title 33 » CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER N—OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF ACTIVITIES › PART 142—WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH › Subpart C—General Workplace Conditions

33 C.F.R. § 142.87

Guarding of deck openings

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Openings in decks accessible to personnel must be covered, guarded, or otherwise made inaccessible when not in use. The manner of blockage shall prevent a person's foot or body from inadvertently passing through the opening.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2010–2022 · leading case: Baham v. Nobors Drilling USA, Lp, 721 F. Supp. 2d 499 (W.D. La. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Baham v. Nobors Drilling USA, Lp, 721 F. Supp. 2d 499 (W.D. La. 2010). · cites it 3× “Specifically, Baham asserts that Nabors violated Coast Guard regulation 33 C.F.R. § 142.87 , setting forth the duty to cover, guard or otherwise make inaccessible deck openings when not in use to prevent a person’s foot or body from inadvertently passing through the opening.”
Lejo Baham v. Nabors Drilling USA L.P., 449 F. App'x 334 (5th Cir. 2011). · cites it 5× “33 C.F.R. § 142.87 . Baham is a crane mechanic.”
Olivier v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (M.D. La. 2022). · cites it 2× “46 See 33 C.F.R. § 142.87 ; see also Rec. Doc. No.”
Olivier v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (M.D. La. 2022). · cites it 2× “46 See 33 C.F.R. § 142.87 ; see also Rec. Doc. No.”
Olivier v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (M.D. La. 2022). “Examples of such regulations directly applicable to this case are 33 C.F.R. § 142.87 (Guarding of deck openings), 30 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.