C.F.R. » Title 33 » CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL › PART 6—PROTECTION AND SECURITY OF VESSELS, HARBORS, AND WATERFRONT FACILITIES › Subpart 6.04—General Provisions

33 C.F.R. § 6.04-8

Possession and control of vessels

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Captain of the Port may supervise and control the movement of any vessel and shall take full or partial possession or control of any vessel or any part thereof, within the territorial waters of the United States under the Captain of the Port's jurisdiction, whenever it appears to the Captain of the Port that such action is necessary in order to secure such vessel from damage or injury, including damage to any data, information, network, program, system, or other digital infrastructure thereon or therein, or to prevent damage or injury to any vessel or waterfront facility or waters of the United States, or to secure the observance of rights and obligations of the United States.

[E.O. 14116, 89 FR 13972, Feb. 26, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1961–1994 · leading case: SKIBS A/S GYLFE v. Hyman-Michaels Co., 304 F. Supp. 1204 (E.D. Mich. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
SKIBS A/S GYLFE v. Hyman-Michaels Co., 304 F. Supp. 1204 (E.D. Mich. 1969). · cites it 2× “The central issue presented in this suit is whether the Coast Guard was required to hold the Gyda in Detroit and if so under what circumstances it could release the ship The ship plaintiffs have argued that the regulations at 33 C.F.R. §§ 6.04-8 , 6.12-1 and 6.14-1 give the…”
Rich v. Naviera Vacuba, S.A., 197 F. Supp. 710 (E.D. Va. 1961). “§ 191 or 33 C.F.R. § 6.04-8 , unless it falls within the legislative purpose of securing “the observance of the rights and obligations of the United States.”
Skibs A/S Gylfe v. Hyman-Michaels Co., 438 F.2d 803 (6th Cir. 1971). “The District Court found that the regulations relied upon ( 33 C.F.R. § 6.04-8 , 6.12-1 and 6.14-1) did not require the Coast Guard to detain a ship with overheated steel turnings, but that 46 U.”
New Jersey, Dep't of Env't Prot. & Energy v. Long Island Power Auth., 30 F.3d 403 (3rd Cir. 1994). “waters, 33 C.F.R. § 6.04-8 , to require the securing of permits for handling, storage, loading and unloading dangerous cargo, id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.