33 C.F.R. § 64.01
Purpose
This part prescribes rules relating to the marking of structures, sunken vessels and other obstructions for the protection of maritime navigation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1974–2009 · leading case: Drummond v. Lawley, 38 So. 3d 41 (Ala. 2009).
Drummond v. Lawley, 38 So. 3d 41 (Ala. 2009). “" 33 C.F.R. § 64.01 . In this context, "structures" are "any fixed or floating obstruction, intentionally placed in the water, which may interfere with or restrict maritime navigation," and "obstructions" are "anything that restricts, endangers, or interferes with navigation.”
Walter Douglas Nunley v. M/v Dauntless Colocotronis, United States of Am. & Combi Lines v. Point Landing, Inc., 727 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1984). “The regulations enforcing this section are found at 33 C.F.R. § 64.01 and provide in pertinent part: § 64.”
Targa Midstream Servs. Ltd. P'ship v. K-Sea Transp. Partners, L.P., 527 F. Supp. 2d 598 (S.D. Tex. 2007). “” 33 C.F.R. § 64.01 . Part 64 imposes a duty upon the owner of a vessel that sinks in navigable waters to “mark it immediately with a buoy or daymark during the day and with a light at night.”
Ingram Corp. v. The Ohio River Co., 505 F.2d 1364 (6th Cir. 1974). “a navigable channel, accidently or otherwise, it shall be the duty of the owner of such sunken craft to immediately mark it with a buoy or beacon during the day and a lighted lantern at night, and to maintain such marks until the sunken craft is removed or abandoned, and the…”
Ison v. Roof, 698 F.2d 294 (6th Cir. 1983). “§ 409 and 33 C.F.R. § 64.01 . 33 U.S.C. § 409 provides: *297 § 409.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.