C.F.R. » Title 33 » CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER F—VESSEL OPERATING REGULATIONS › PART 96—RULES FOR THE SAFE OPERATION OF VESSELS AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS › Subpart B—Company and Vessel Safety Management Systems

33 C.F.R. § 96.230

What objectives must a safety management system meet?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The safety management system must:

(a) Provide for safe practices in vessel operation and a safe work environment onboard the type of vessel the system is developed for;

(b) Establish and implement safeguards against all identified risks;

(c) Establish and implement actions to continuously improve safety management skills of personnel ashore and aboard vessels, including preparation for emergencies related to both safety and environmental protection; and

(d) Ensure compliance with mandatory rules and regulations, taking into account relevant national and international regulations, standards, codes and maritime industry guidelines, when developing procedures and policies for the safety management system.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2004–2017 · leading case: Johnson v. Horizon Lines, LLC, 520 F. Supp. 2d 524 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johnson v. Horizon Lines, LLC, 520 F. Supp. 2d 524 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). · cites it 5× “25-15 and 33 C.F.R. § 96.230 . These regulations constitute the governing law on this motion for partial summary judgment.”
Soliman v. Maersk Line Ltd., 235 F. Supp. 3d 410 (E.D.N.Y 2017). “33 C.F.R. § 96.230 (b). Consistent with this mandate, Maersk has a SMS, which was audited and found compliant.”
Kyles v. E. Car Liners, Inc., 598 S.E.2d 353 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “, 33 CFR 96.230. On December 24, 1997, the U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.