C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 300—ASSISTANCE TO STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES › Subpart A—General

34 C.F.R. § 300.23

Individualized education program team

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Individualized education program team or IEP Team means a group of individuals described in § 300.321 that is responsible for developing, reviewing, or revising an IEP for a child with a disability.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414(d)(1)(B))
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2023 · leading case: JG v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist., 552 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
JG v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist., 552 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “34 C.F.R. § 300.23 . The Hearing Officer's detailed findings of fact, adopted by the State Review Officer and affirmed by the district court, demonstrate that the District did have personnel capable of implementing the IEPs.”
Manchester-Essex Reg'l Sch. Dist. Sch. Comm. v. Bureau of Special Educ. Appeals of the Massachusetts Dep't of Educ., 490 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D. Mass. 2007). · cites it 2× “All such services must be provided by “qualified personnel”, defined as those individuals who have State-approved or State-recognized certification, licensure, registration or other comparable requirements, see 34 C.F.R. § 300.23 , and they must be “appropriately trained and…”
J.B. v. Tuolumne Cnty. Superintendent of Schs. (E.D. Cal. 2021). “See 34 C.F.R. § 300.23 . Plaintiff 16 expresses concern that the findings and recommendation in addressing this issue may 17 inadvertently incentivize” LEAs to “exonerate otherwise unwarranted delays in offering residential placement by claiming 18 reliance on outside persons…”
Dervishi v. Stamford Bd. of Educ. (D. Conn. 2023). “34 C.F.R. § 300.23 . The IEP team/PPT includes the parent of the disabled child, several school officials, and, at the discretion of the parent or the local educational agency, any other individual with knowledge or special expertise regarding the child.”
Jg v. Douglas Cnty. (9th Cir. 2008). “34 C.F.R. § 300.23 . The Hearing Officer’s detailed findings of fact, adopted by the State Review Officer and affirmed by the district court, demonstrate that the District did have personnel capable of implementing the IEPs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.