C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 300—ASSISTANCE TO STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES › Subpart D—Evaluations, Eligibility Determinations, Individualized Education Programs, and Educational Placements

34 C.F.R. § 300.327

Educational placements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Consistent with § 300.501(c), each public agency must ensure that the parents of each child with a disability are members of any group that makes decisions on the educational placement of their child.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414(e))
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2022 · leading case: T.B. ex rel. Brenneise v. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist., 806 F.3d 451 (9th Cir. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
T.B. ex rel. Brenneise v. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist., 806 F.3d 451 (9th Cir. 2015). “, 34 C.F.R. § 300.327 . Therefore, the Brenneises prevailed on Issue 15.”
N.W. v. Dist. of Columbia, 253 F. Supp. 3d 5 (D.D.C. 2017). “§ 1414 (e); 34 C.F.R. § 300.327 ; see also 34 C.F.R. § 300.”
Adams ex rel. T.J. v. Dist. of Columbia, 285 F. Supp. 3d 381 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “§ 1414 (e) ; 34 C.F.R. § 300.327 , when DCPS allowed its "LRE team" to determine the appropriate placement to implement T.”
Cooper v. Dist. of Columbia, 77 F. Supp. 3d 32 (D.D.C. 2014). “§ 1414 (e); 34 C.F.R. § 300.327 ; see J.N. v. District of Columbia, 677 F.”
Wilkins Ex Rel. D.W. v. Dist. of Columbia, 571 F. Supp. 2d 163 (D.D.C. 2008). “§ 1414 (e); 34 C.F.R. § 300.327 . The placement decision, in addition to conforming to a student’s IEP, should also consider the least restrictive environment and a setting closest to the student’s home.”
T.B. v. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist., 795 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2015). “, 34 C.F.R. § 300.327 . Therefore, the Brenneises prevailed on Issue 15.”
Steven R.F. v. Harrison Sch. Dist. No. 2, 331 F. Supp. 3d 1227 (D. Colo. 2018). “1414(e) ("each public agency must ensure the parents of each child with a disability are members of any group that makes decisions on the educational placement of their child.”
A.P., by & through her Parent, L.P. v. Sch. Bd. of Fairfax Cnty. (E.D. Va. 2022). “34 C.F.R. 300.327; see also 20 U.S.C. 1414(e).”
T.B. v. San Diego Usd (9th Cir. 2015). “, 34 C.F.R. § 300.327 . Therefore, the Brenneises prevailed on Issue 15.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.