C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 300—ASSISTANCE TO STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES › Subpart A—General

34 C.F.R. § 300.41

State educational agency

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

State educational agency or SEA means the State board of education or other agency or officer primarily responsible for the State supervision of public elementary schools and secondary schools, or, if there is no such officer or agency, an officer or agency designated by the Governor or by State law.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(32))
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2015–2022 · leading case: Bradley v. Jefferson Cnty. Pub. Schs. (W.D. Ky. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bradley v. Jefferson Cnty. Pub. Schs. (W.D. Ky. 2022). “§ 1401 (32); 34 C.F.R. § 300.41 . 2. Statutory and Regulatory Limitations on FAPE Under the IDEA, the term FAPE, inter alia, is defined as follows: The term “free appropriate public education” means special education and related services that— (A) have been provided at public…”
Bradley v. Jefferson Cnty. Pub. Schs. (W.D. Ky. 2022). “§ 1401 (32); 34 C.F.R. § 300.41 . 2. Statutory and Regulatory Limitations on FAPE Under the IDEA, the term FAPE, inter alia, is defined as follows: The term “free appropriate public education” means special education and related services that— (A) have been provided at public…”
Bradley v. Jefferson Cnty. Pub. Schs. (W.D. Ky. 2022). “§ 1401 (32); 34 C.F.R. § 300.41 . 2. Statutory and Regulatory Limitations on FAPE Under the IDEA, the term FAPE, inter alia, is defined as follows: The term “free appropriate public education” means special education and related services that— (A) have been provided at public…”
East Ramapo Cent. Sch. Dist. v. King, 130 A.D.3d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015). “28 [a]), to challenge a determination of respondent State Education Department, a state educational agency (hereinafter SEA) (see 20 USC § 1401 [32]; 34 CFR 300.41), that regulated and enforced petitioner’s compliance with the mandates of the Individuals with Disabilities…”
East Ramapo Cent. Sch. Dist. v. King, 130 A.D.3d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015). “28 [a]), to challenge a determination of respondent State Education Department, a state educational agency (hereinafter SEA) (see 20 USC § 1401 [32]; 34 CFR 300.41), that regulated and enforced petitioner’s compliance with the mandates of the Individuals with Disabilities…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.