C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 300—ASSISTANCE TO STATES FOR THE EDUCATION OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES › Subpart A—General

34 C.F.R. § 300.6

Assistive technology service

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Assistive technology service means any service that directly assists a child with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive technology device. The term includes—

(a) The evaluation of the needs of a child with a disability, including a functional evaluation of the child in the child's customary environment;

(b) Purchasing, leasing, or otherwise providing for the acquisition of assistive technology devices by children with disabilities;

(c) Selecting, designing, fitting, customizing, adapting, applying, maintaining, repairing, or replacing assistive technology devices;

(d) Coordinating and using other therapies, interventions, or services with assistive technology devices, such as those associated with existing education and rehabilitation plans and programs;

(e) Training or technical assistance for a child with a disability or, if appropriate, that child's family; and

(f) Training or technical assistance for professionals (including individuals providing education or rehabilitation services), employers, or other individuals who provide services to, employ, or are otherwise substantially involved in the major life functions of that child.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(2))
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2021 · leading case: A.S. & W.S. v. Trumbull Bd. of Educ., 414 F. Supp. 2d 152 (D. Conn. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
A.S. & W.S. v. Trumbull Bd. of Educ., 414 F. Supp. 2d 152 (D. Conn. 2006). “See 34 C.F.R. § 300.6 (defining "Assistive technology service” to include "Training or technical assistance”).”
Miller v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schs. Bd. of Educ. (W.D.N.C. 2021). “520 ; see also 34 C.F.R. § 300.6 ; NC Policies 1504-2.1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.