34 C.F.R. § 668.131

Definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The following definitions apply to this subpart:

Eligible noncitizen: An individual possessing an immigration status that meets the requirements of § 668.33(a)(2).

Immigration status: The status conferred on a noncitizen under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended, 8 U.S.C. 1182.

Primary confirmation: A process by which the Secretary, by means of a matching program conducted with the INS, compares the information contained in an Application for Federal Student Aid or a multiple data entry application regarding the immigration status of a noncitizen applicant for title IV, HEA assistance with records of that status maintained by the INS in its Alien Status Verification Index (ASVI) system for the purpose of determining whether a student's immigration status meets the requirements of § 668.33(a)(2) and reports the results of this comparison on an output document.

Secondary confirmation: A process by which the INS, in response to the submission of INS Document Verification Form G-845 by an institution, searches pertinent paper and automated INS files, other than the ASVI database, for the purpose of determining a student's immigration status and the validity of the submitted INS documents, and reports the results of this search to the institution.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1091) [58 FR 3184, Jan. 7, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 12521, Mar. 16, 1994; 63 FR 40626, July 29, 1998]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: Montana Immigrant Just. All. v. Bullock, 2016 MT 104 (Mont. 2016).
Montana Immigrant Just. All. v. Bullock, 2016 MT 104 (Mont. 2016). · cites it 2× “§ 1324a(h)(3), and “eligible noncitizen,” 34 C.F.R. § 668.131 , but it does not define the term “illegal alien,” and it does not have a comprehensive definition of “lawfully present,” Chaudhry v.”
Montana Immigrant Just. All., 2016 MT 104 (Mont. 2016). “§ 1324a(h)(3), and “eligible noncitizen,” 34 C.F.R. § 668.131 , but it does not define the term “illegal alien,” and it does not have a comprehensive definition of “lawfully present,” Chaudhry v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.