C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER VI—OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 690—FEDERAL PELL GRANT PROGRAM › Subpart B—Application Procedures for Determining Expected Family Contribution

34 C.F.R. § 690.12

Application

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) As the first step to receiving a Federal Pell Grant, a student shall apply on an approved application form to the Secretary to have his or her expected family contribution calculated. A copy of this form is not acceptable.

(b) The student shall submit an application to the Secretary by—

(1) Providing the application form, signed by all appropriate family members, to the institution at which the student attends or plans to attend so that the institution can transmit electronically the application information to the Secretary under EDE; or

(2) Sending an approved application form to the Secretary.

(c) The student shall provide the address of his or her residence unless the student is incarcerated and the educational institution has made special arrangements with the Secretary to receive relevant correspondence on behalf of the student. If such an arrangement is made, the student shall provide the address indicated by the institution.

(d) For each award year the Secretary, through publication in the Federal Register, establishes deadline dates for submitting these applications and for making corrections to the information contained in the applications.

[50 FR 10721, Mar. 15, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 54732, Nov. 1, 1994; 60 FR 21438, May 2, 1995; 60 FR 30789, June 12, 1995; 61 FR 60397, Nov. 27, 1996; 86 FR 59626, Oct. 28, 2021]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–1999 · leading case: Harvey Dozier v. Loop Coll., City of Chicago, 776 F.2d 752 (7th Cir. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harvey Dozier v. Loop Coll., City of Chicago, 776 F.2d 752 (7th Cir. 1985). “34 C.F.R. § 690.12 (1984). Dozier’s father refused to supply the requisite information, and Dozier was denied federal financial aid.”
Beth Jacob Hebrew Teachers Coll. v. Riley, 73 F. Supp. 2d 262 (E.D.N.Y 1999). “34 C.F.R. § 690.12 (1994); 34 C.F.R. §§ 690.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.