C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER VI—OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 690—FEDERAL PELL GRANT PROGRAM › Subpart G—Administration of Grant Payments

34 C.F.R. § 690.71

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart deals with program administration by an institution of higher education.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a) [50 FR 10724, Mar. 15, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 43162, Nov. 28, 1986; 59 FR 54730, Nov. 1, 1994; 60 FR 61816, Dec. 1, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1982–2014 · leading case: Grove City Coll. v. Bell, 687 F.2d 684 (3rd Cir. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Grove City Coll. v. Bell, 687 F.2d 684 (3rd Cir. 1982). “34 C.F.R. §§ 690.71 , 690.78. Under the Alternative Disbursement System, the grants are mailed directly to the students after the institution makes the appropriate certification.”
United States v. Teeven, 745 F. Supp. 220 (D. Del. 1990). “§ 1094 (a); 34 C.F.R. §§ 690.71 , 690.12(a) (Pell Grant program).”
Shaffer v. Block, 705 F.2d 805 (6th Cir. 1983). “34 C.F.R. §§ 690.71 , .72, .75, .78 (1981).”
Manuel v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 105 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “61 (2013); 34 C.F.R. 690.71 (2013). Therefore, the statute governing eligibility of the Pell Grants program is not money mandating statute and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider plaintiffs claim to be given a permanent waiver from the limitations on Pell Grant eligibility.”
Manuel v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2014). “61 (2013); 34 C.F.R. 690.71 (2013). Therefore, the statute governing eligibility of the Pell Grants program is not money mandating statute and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider plaintiff's claim to be given a permanent waiver from the limitations on Pell Grant…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.