C.F.R. » Title 36 » CHAPTER I—NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › PART 2—RESOURCE PROTECTION, PUBLIC USE AND RECREATION

36 C.F.R. § 2.11

Picnicking

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Picnicking is allowed, except in designated areas closed in accordance with § 1.5. The superintendent may establish conditions for picnicking in areas where picnicking is allowed. Picnicking in violation of established conditions is prohibited.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1976–1982 · leading case: United States v. Carl E. Brown, 552 F.2d 817 (8th Cir. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Carl E. Brown, 552 F.2d 817 (8th Cir. 1977). · cites it 2× “36 C.F.R. §§ 2.11 and 2.32. Brown concedes that he was hunting ducks on water within the park.”
United States v. Brown, 431 F. Supp. 56 (D. Minnesota 1976). · cites it 4× “36 C.F.R. §§ 2.11 and 2.32. Mr. Brown concedes and the Magistrate found that he was hunting ducks and, in fact, shot at a passing duck while the Rangers were issuing a citation to him.”
United States v. McLean, 547 F. Supp. 9 (W.D.N.C. 1981). “Paul Teal, Chief Magistrate on December 12, 1980 to a charge of “the possession of a loaded, unpacked, and uncased weapon on or about December 6, 1980, within the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, a Federal Reservation, in violation of 36 C.F.R. 2.11(a).” He was also charged…”
United States v. Richard W. McLean, 688 F.2d 242 (4th Cir. 1982). “§ 403h-3 for carrying a loaded uncased weapon in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 2.11 (a). He admits that he was carrying the weapon, but contends that the area in which he was charged with carrying a weapon consisting of a 44,400 acre tract…”
— 36 C.F.R. § 2.11(a) — 1 case
United States v. McLean, 547 F. Supp. 9 (W.D.N.C. 1981). “Paul Teal, Chief Magistrate on December 12, 1980 to a charge of “the possession of a loaded, unpacked, and uncased weapon on or about December 6, 1980, within the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, a Federal Reservation, in violation of 36 C.F.R. 2.11(a).” He was also charged…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.