36 C.F.R. § 222.8

Cooperation in control of estray or unbranded livestock, animal diseases, noxious farm weeds, and use of pesticides

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Insofar as it involves National Forest System lands and other lands under Forest Service control or the livestock which graze thereupon, the Chief, Forest Service, will cooperate with:

(1) State, county, and Federal agencies in the application and enforcement of all laws and regulations relating to livestock diseases, sanitation and noxious farm weeds.

(2) The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and other Federal or State agencies and institutions in surveillance of pesticides spray programs; and

(3) State cattle and sheep sanitary or brand boards in control of estray and unbranded livestock to the extent it does not conflict with the Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act of December 15, 1971.

(b) The Chief, Forest Service, will cooperate with county or other local weed control districts in analyzing noxious farm weed problems and developing control programs in areas of which the National Forests and National Grasslands are a part.

(85 Stat. 649 (16 U.S.C. 1331-1340))
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Legro v. Robinson, 2015 COA 183 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015).
Legro v. Robinson, 2015 COA 183 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015). “146 A grazing permit, such as the one at issue here, confers only a nonexclusive, revocable license to access federal lands for a limited purpose (here, grazing) and is subject to numerous terms and conditions; it "convey[s] no right, title, or interest held by the United States…”
— 36 C.F.R. § 222.8(b) — 1 case
Legro v. Robinson, 2015 COA 183 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015). “146 A grazing permit, such as the one at issue here, confers only a nonexclusive, revocable license to access federal lands for a limited purpose (here, grazing) and is subject to numerous terms and conditions; it "convey[s] no right, title, or interest held by the United States…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.