C.F.R. » Title 36 » CHAPTER II—FOREST SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › PART 251—LAND USES › Subpart B—Special Uses

36 C.F.R. § 251.52

Delegation of authority

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Special use authorizations shall be issued, granted, amended, renewed, suspended, terminated, or revoked by the Chief, or through delegation, by the Regional Forester, Forest Supervisor, District Ranger or other forest officer, and shall be in such form and contain such terms, stipulations, conditions, and agreements as may be required by the regulations of the Secretary and the instructions of the Chief (7 CFR 2.60; 36 CFR part 200, subpart B).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2002 · leading case: Son Broad., Inc. v. United States, 52 Fed. Cl. 815 (Fed. Cl. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Son Broad., Inc. v. United States, 52 Fed. Cl. 815 (Fed. Cl. 2002). · cites it 2× “36 C.F.R. § 251.52 . A “special use authorization” is defined as “a permit, term permit, lease, or easement which allows occupancy, use, rights, or privileges of the National Forest System land.”
The Great Am. Houseboat Co., a California Corp. v. The United States of Am., (u.s. Forest Serv.), 780 F.2d 741 (9th Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “36 C.F.R. § 251.52 (1984). From July 20, 1978 until February 22, 1983 Forest Service policy on multiple ownership of houseboats was set forth in a set of standard houseboat use permit conditions (“Old Conditions”).”
Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Espy, 986 F.2d 1568 (9th Cir. 1993). “Helpful analogies may be found in 36 C.F.R. § 251.52 , which lists all of the following as "types of use” for which special use authorizations may be issued in accordance with particular statutes: operation of public sanitariums or hotels near mineral springs; examination of…”
W. Radio Servs. Co. v. Espy, 79 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 1996). “Western contends that the Service acted arbitrarily and capriciously by issuing a permit and following a procedure that failed to comply with the Service’s regulations, 36 C.F.R. §§ 251.52 , 251.54 (1995), and the Service’s guidelines in its Manual and Handbook.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.