36 C.F.R. § 261.51
Posting
Posting is accomplished by:
(a) Placing a copy of the order imposing each prohibition in the offices of the Forest Supervisor and District Ranger, or equivalent officer who have jurisdiction over the lands affected by the order, and
(b) Displaying each prohibition imposed by an order in such locations and manner as to reasonably bring the prohibition to the attention of the public.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2025 · leading case: United States v. John E. Johnson, III William v. Letempt Jeffery O. Pike Daniel Gallagher, 159 F.3d 892 (4th Cir. 1998).
United States v. John E. Johnson, III William v. Letempt Jeffery O. Pike Daniel Gallagher, 159 F.3d 892 (4th Cir. 1998). “50 (1998), 36 C.F.R. § 261.51 (1998) and 36 C.F.R.§ 261.”
United States v. Fee, 787 F. Supp. 963 (D. Colo. 1992). “Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 261.51 , signs were posted around the perimeter of the timber sale boundary at intervals so that each was clearly visible from the next.”
United States v. Atwell, 752 F. Supp. 2d 1171 (D. Or. 2010). “50 , because even if it does, it does not satisfy the posting requirements of 36 C.F.R. § 261.51 . III. POSTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER 36 C.”
United States v. Monica Francis (9th Cir. 2018). “See 36 C.F.R. § 261.51 (a). The Forest Service website and signs in the forest where Francis camped “reasonably [brought] the prohibition to the attention of the public.”
Wilkins v. United States (9th Cir. 2025). “See 36 C.F.R. § 261.51 (b) (2005). Bull, a forest supervisor from 2002 to 2009, testified in his deposition that the Forest Service typically acted according to its regulations.”
Beall v. Mcgaha (10th Cir. 1997). “” 36 C.F.R. § 261.51 . The order was posted at the Glenwood Ranger District Office, the Gila National Forest Supervisor’s Office, and on a Forest Service bulletin board at the entrance to the hot springs on Forest Service Road 519.”
United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 1998). “50 (1998), 36 C.F.R. § 261.51 (1998) and 36 C.F.R. § 261.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.