(a) It is a Federal crime pursuant to the provisions of sections 111 and 1114 of Title 18, United States Code, to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with, attempt to kill or kill any civilian official or employee for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers engaged in the performance of his or her official duties, or on account of the performance of his or her official duties. Such actions or interference directed against a Federal employee while carrying out the regulations in this part are violation of such regulations and may be a state crime pursuant to the laws of the state where they occur.
(b) Failure to comply with a lawful order issued by a Federal employee acting pursuant to the regulations in this part shall be considered as interference with that employee while engaged in the performance of their official duties. Such interference with a Federal employee includes failure to provide a correct name, address or other information deemed necessary for identification upon request of the Federal employee, when that employee is authorized by the District Commander to issue citations in the performance of the employee's official duties.
[65 FR 6903, Feb. 11, 2000]
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Duane A. Willfong, 274 F.3d 1297 (9th Cir. 2001).
“” Army Corps of Engineers: 36 C.F.R. § 327.24 (a), titled “Interference with Government employees,” makes it a crime to “.”
Burch v. Naron, 333 F. Supp. 2d 816 (W.D. Ark. 2004).
“When Plaintiff refused to comply, the Ranger cited him with a violation of 36 C.F.R. 327.24(b), the failure to comply with a lawful order issued by a federal employee.”
Hobbs v. M3 Eng'g & Tech. Corp. (D. Ariz. 2023).
“§ 552 , CC at 35, First and Fourteenth Amendment retaliation, CC at 35–40, 22 criminal interference with a government employee under 36 C.F.R. § 327.24 , CC at 46, 23 perjury under 18 U.”
United States v. James Kavanagh (8th Cir. 1999).
“22 (a) (1998); and with failing to comply with a lawful order of Corps personnel engaged in the performance of their official duties, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 327.24 (b) (1998). Following a bench trial, the district court1 found that a lease 1 The Honorable Catherine D.”
— 36 C.F.R. § 327.24(b) — 1 case
Burch v. Naron, 333 F. Supp. 2d 816 (W.D. Ark. 2004).
“When Plaintiff refused to comply, the Ranger cited him with a violation of 36 C.F.R. 327.24(b), the failure to comply with a lawful order issued by a federal employee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.