36 C.F.R. § 327.25

Violations of rules and regulations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any person who violates the provisions of the regulations in this part, other than for a failure to pay authorized recreation use fees as separately provided for in § 327.23, may be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or imprisonment for not more than six months or both and may be tried and sentenced in accordance with the provisions of section 3401 of Title 18, United States Code. Persons designated by the District Commander shall have the authority to issue a citation for violation of the regulations in this part, requiring any person charged with the violation to appear before the United States Magistrate within whose jurisdiction the affected water resources development project is located (16 U.S.C. 460d).

(b) Any person who commits an act against any official or employee of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that is a crime under the provisions of section 111 or section 1114 of Title 18, United States Code or under provisions of pertinent state law may be tried and sentenced as further provided under Federal or state law, as the case may be.

[65 FR 6903, Feb. 11, 2000]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2015 · leading case: GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 788 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 788 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2015). “§ 460d; 36 C.F.R. § 327.25 . As a result, the Corps must rely on cooperative agreements with local law enforcement agencies to provide increased patrols during peak visitation periods.”

United States v. Davis, 339 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2003). “” The penalty for violating these regulations is set out in 36 C.F.R. § 327.25 , which provides that "[a]ny person who violates the provisions of the regulators in this part .”

GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 38 F. Supp. 3d 1365 (N.D. Ga. 2014). “¶ 27; 36 C.F.R. § 327.25 .) Plaintiffs state that “[b]ut for the application and enforcement of [the Firearms Regulation], [Plaintiff] James would keep and carry a handgun in case of confrontation when he recreates and camps at Allatoona.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.