36 C.F.R. § 51.44

How will the Director determine if a concessioner was satisfactory for purposes of a right of preference?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

To be a satisfactory concessioner for the purposes of a right of preference, the Director must determine that the concessioner operated satisfactorily on an overall basis during the term of its applicable concession contract, including extensions of the contract. The Director will base this determination in consideration of annual evaluations made by the Director of the concessioner's performance under the terms of the applicable concession contract and other relevant facts and circumstances. The Director must determine that a concessioner did not operate satisfactorily on an overall basis during the term of a concession contract if the annual evaluations of the concessioner made subsequent to May 17, 2000 are less than satisfactory for any two or more years of operation under the concession contract.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2001 · leading case: Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 142 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D.D.C. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 142 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D.D.C. 2001). “” 36 C.F.R. § 51.44 . The defendants explain that this provision is not a license to investigate conces-sioners and hide the evidence from them until the time for renewal.”

Amfac Resorts, LLC v. Us Dept. of Interior, 142 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D.D.C. 2001). “" 36 C.F.R. § 51.44 . The defendants explain that this provision is not a license to investigate concessioners and hide the evidence from them until the time for renewal.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.