37 C.F.R. § 1.127
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1990–2010 · leading case: In Re Kenneth L. Berger, 279 F.3d 975 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
In Re Kenneth L. Berger, 279 F.3d 975 (Fed. Cir. 2002). “37 C.F.R. § 1.127 (2000). The discretionary decision of the examiner to refuse to enter Berger’s amendments submitted after final rejection is not reviewable by this court in this proceeding.”
In Re Meyer Mfg. Corp., 411 F. App'x 316 (Fed. Cir. 2010). “The USPTO responds that this question is not properly before the court because, under 37 C.F.R. § 1.127 and In re Berger, 279 F.”
Leeds v. Quigg, 745 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1990). “37 C.F.R. § 1.127 — Petition from refusal to admit an amendment.”
In re Muresan, 33 F. App'x 521 (Fed. Cir. 2002). “Moreover, the January 28, 1996, claim is not materially different from the May 1996 application because it too is not limited to a ball in contact with only two shafts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.