37 C.F.R. § 1.191
Appeal to Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Appeals to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board under 35 U.S.C. 134(a) and (b) are conducted according to part 41 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1978–2011 · leading case: In Re Lovin, 652 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2011).
In Re Lovin, 652 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2011). “We thus “vacate[d] the Board’s decision for failure to review all the appealed claims in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.191 , 1.192, and 1.196.” 5 Id.”
In Re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill & James G. Larsen, 33 F.3d 1526 (Fed. Cir. 1994). “See 37 C.F.R. § 1.191 et. seq. (1993). Inherent in this adjudicative posture are certain standards of conduct.”
Pic Inc. v. Prescon Corp., 485 F. Supp. 1302 (D. Del. 1980). “37 C.F.R. § 1.191 . 11 . 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.193 (a), 1.”
Hyatt v. Dudas, 393 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2005). “§ 134 ; 37 C.F.R. § 1.191 . Upon completion of the briefing process, the Board may affirm or reverse the decision of the examiner or remand the application to the examiner for further consideration.”
In Re Richard C. Beaver, 893 F.2d 329 (Fed. Cir. 1989). “828,029, we vacate the Board’s decision for failure to review all the appealed claims in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.191 , 1.192, and 1.196, thus failing to fulfill the requirements of 35 U.”
In re Zurko, 142 F.3d 1447 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “Panels of at least three board members selected by the Commissioner review twice-rejected or final decisions of a primary examiner, see 37 C.F.R. § 1.191 (1997), and can affirm or reverse on the grounds specified by the examiner, or remand to the examiner for further…”
Honeywell Int'l Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., 370 F.3d 1131 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “181 rather than by appeal under 37 C.F.R. § 1.191 . Ex parte Porter, 25 USPQ2d 1144, 1147 (Bd.”
Honeywell, Inc. v. Diamond, 499 F. Supp. 924 (D.D.C. 1980). “§ 134 (1976); 37 C.F.R. § 1.191 (1979), to the Board of Appeals within the Patent and Trademark Office.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Wencke, 577 F.2d 619 (9th Cir. 1978). “§ 134 ; 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.191 -.198.) Judicial review of the Board’s determination is available alternatively in the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (35 U.”
In re Volk, 634 F.2d 607 (C.C.P.A. 1980). “Rule 191 ( 37 C.F.R. § 1.191 (1980)), reads in pertinent part: (a) Every applicant for a patent or for reissue of a patent, any of the claims of which have been twice rejected, or who has been given a final rejection (§ 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.