37 C.F.R. § 201.5
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1968–2024 · leading case: PaySys Int'l, Inc. v. Atos Se, 226 F. Supp. 3d 206 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).
PaySys Int'l, Inc. v. Atos Se, 226 F. Supp. 3d 206 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “§ 408 (d); 37 C.F.R. § 201.5 (b)(2) (“Supplementary registration may be made either to correct or to amplify the information in a basic registration.”
L.A. Printex Indus., Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc., 676 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 2012). “§ 408 (d); 37 C.F.R. § 201.5 . “The information contained in a supplementary registration augments but does not supersede that contained in the earlier registration,” 17 U.”
Urantia Found., a Non-Profit Found. v. Kristen Maaherra, 114 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 1997). “Focusing on the language of the first proviso of Section *962 304(a), and on a Copyright Office regulation which provides the manner in which renewal registrations may be corrected, 37 C.F.R. § 201.5 (b)(2)(iv), she argues that because the renewal certificate described the…”
Fam. Dollar Stores, Inc. v. United Fabrics Int'l, Inc., 896 F. Supp. 2d 223 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “§ 408 (d); 37 C.F.R. § 201.5 . “The information contained in a supplementary registration augments but does not supersede that contained in the earlier registration,” 17 U.”
Jones v. Virgin Records, Ltd., 643 F. Supp. 1153 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). “For example, plaintiffs did not utilize the applicable form, “CA”, to apply for a supplemental registration as required by the Copyright Office Rules and Regulations, 37 C.F.R. § 201.5 (c)(2) (1985), nor did they provide information necessary to modify non-substantive…”
Wales Indus. Inc. v. Hasbro Bradley, Inc., 612 F. Supp. 510 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). “§ 408(d); 37 C.F.R. § 201.5 . 13 . See Eckes v. Card Prices Update, 736 F.”
King Records, Inc. v. Bennett, 438 F. Supp. 2d 812 (M.D. Tenn. 2006). “§ 408 (d) 11 or 37 C.F.R. § 201.5 to correct the mistake.”
R. Ready Prods., Inc. v. Cantrell, 85 F. Supp. 2d 672 (S.D. Tex. 2000). “Copyright Office and Procedures General Provisions, 37 C.F.R. § 201.5 . The information in a supplemental registration “augments but does not supersede that contained in the earlier registration.”
Kenbrooke Fabrics, Inc. v. Soho Fashions, Inc., 690 F. Supp. 298 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). “There remains the possibility that such errors were in fact innocent.”
Raquel, a P'ship v. Educ. Mgmt. Corp. Art Institutes Int'l, Inc. Geffen Records Inc. Nirvana, a P'ship Elias/savion, Inc. Philip Elias, Individually Raquel, 196 F.3d 171 (3rd Cir. 1999). “] 42 37 C.F.R. 201.5(b). 43 Raquel's effort to use its supplementary registration to change the nature of the work as set forth in its original registration does not neatly fit into the concepts of "correction" or "amplification" as used in the regulation.”
Lucky Break Wishbone Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 528 F. Supp. 2d 1106 (W.D. Wash. 2007). “§ 408 (d) (addressing issue of supplementary registration); 37 C.F.R. § 201.5 (same).”
Corbello v. DeVito, 844 F. Supp. 2d 1136 (D. Nev. 2012). “Although her supplemental registration identifies DeVito’s basic registration, because no basic registrant (DeVito) signed the supplemental registration, the office could not annotate DeVito’s basic registration with the fact of Plaintiffs supplemental registration, see 37…”
— 37 C.F.R. § 201.5(b) — 1 case
Raquel, a P'ship v. Educ. Mgmt. Corp. Art Institutes Int'l, Inc. Geffen Records Inc. Nirvana, a P'ship Elias/savion, Inc. Philip Elias, Individually Raquel, 196 F.3d 171 (3rd Cir. 1999). “] 42 37 C.F.R. 201.5(b). 43 Raquel's effort to use its supplementary registration to change the nature of the work as set forth in its original registration does not neatly fit into the concepts of "correction" or "amplification" as used in the regulation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.