C.F.R. » Title 37 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL › PART 41—PRACTICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD › Subpart D—Contested Cases

37 C.F.R. § 41.100

Definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to the definitions in § 41.2, the following definitions apply to proceedings under this subpart:

Business day means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday within the District of Columbia.

Involved means the Board has declared the patent application, patent, or claim so described to be a subject of the contested case.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2006–2014 · leading case: Falko-Gunter Falkner, Georg Holzer, & Friedrich Dorner v. Stephen C. Inglis, Michael E.G. Boursnell, & Anthony C. Minson, 448 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Falko-Gunter Falkner, Georg Holzer, & Friedrich Dorner v. Stephen C. Inglis, Michael E.G. Boursnell, & Anthony C. Minson, 448 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2006). · cites it 2× “On September 13, 2004, the "600” rules expired in favor of new rules found at 37 C.F.R. § 41.100 et seq. However, the Board correctly chose to decide the matter under the old rules, given the parties' reliance on them in filing all motions, oppositions, and replies in the case,…”
Evonik Degussa GmbH v. Materia Inc., 53 F. Supp. 3d 778 (D. Del. 2014). “At the time the parties engaged in the Interference proceeding, patent interference procedures were governed by 37 C.F.R. § 41.100 ^41.208 (2006). The Federal Rules of Evidence generally apply to interference proceedings.”
Falko-Gunter Falkner v. Inglis (Fed. Cir. 2006). · cites it 2× “On September 13, 2004, the “600” rules expired in favor of new rules found at 37 C.F.R. § 41.100 et seq. However, the Board correctly chose to decide the matter under the old rules, given the parties’ reliance on them in filing all motions, oppositions, and replies in the case,…”
Omura v. Shafer, 417 F. App'x 960 (Fed. Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “100, 37 C.F.R. § 41.100 , requires that “contested subject matter” in Bd.”
Brand v. Miller (Fed. Cir. 2007). “See 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.100 - 41.158 (regulations governing contested cases); 37 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.