38 C.F.R. § 19.27
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2005–2005 · leading case: Lawrence E. Woznick v. R. James Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 198 (Vet. App. 2005).
Lawrence E. Woznick v. R. James Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 198 (Vet. App. 2005). “28 (2004); see also 38 C.F.R. § 19.27 (2004). Whenever a claimant protests an adverse determination with regard to the adequacy of an NOD, the appropriate action is to issue an SOC.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.