38 C.F.R. § 20.1101

Rule 1101. [Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1993–1993 · leading case: Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 528 (Vet. App. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 528 (Vet. App. 1993). “38 (1992) (“demanded cases will not be closed for failure to respond to the [SSOC]”), see also 38 C.F.R. § 20.1101 (b) (1992) (“remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a final Board decision”).”

Danko v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 445 (Vet. App. 1993). “” 38 C.F.R. § 20.1101 (b) (1992). Therefore, where a claim is in “appellate status” by virtue of a previously filed NOD, the claimant may not file an additional NOD as to that claim.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.