An appellant or representative may record the hearing with his or her own equipment. Filming, videotaping or televising the hearing may only be authorized when prior written consent is obtained from all appellants and contesting claimants, if any, and made a matter of record. In no event will such additional equipment be used if it interferes with the conduct of the hearing or the official recording apparatus. In all such situations, advance arrangements must be made with the Board of Veterans' Appeals, P.O. Box 27063, Washington, DC 20038.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7102, 7107)
[84 FR 34788, July 19, 2019]
Notes of Decisions
Debra B. Sapp v. Robert L. Wilkie, No. 16-3558, 18-0701, 16-2104 (Vet. App. Nov. 27, 2019).
· cites it 4× “38 C.F.R. § 20.713 (a) (2018). The hearing should proceed by first allowing the appellant to present opening testimony and argument, then any contesting party who wishes may present testimony and argument, followed by the appellant's opportunity to present rebuttal.”
Corazon R. Patricio v. David J. Shulkin, No. 13-3924 (Vet. App. Aug. 31, 2017).
“The Board noted that Susan—who is currently in receipt of DIC and could lose that benefit if it is determined by the Board that her marriage to the veteran was terminated by the May 1973 California judgment of divorce—did not appear to have been properly notified of the May 2015…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.