(a) Purposes. The purposes of this program are to provide to eligible veterans with compensable service-connected disabilities all services and assistance necessary to enable them to achieve maximum independence in daily living and, to the maximum extent feasible, to become employable and to obtain and maintain suitable employment.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3100)
(b) Basic requirements. Before a service-disabled veteran may receive training and rehabilitation services under Chapter 31, Title 38 U.S.C., three basic requirements must be met:
(1) The Department of Veterans Affairs must first find that the veteran has basic entitlement to services as prescribed by § 21.40.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3102)
(2) The services necessary for training and rehabilitation must be identified by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the veteran.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3106)
(3) An individual written plan must be developed by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the veteran describing the goals of the program and the means through which these goals will be achieved.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3107)
[49 FR 40814, Oct. 18, 1984; 50 FR 9622, Mar. 11, 1985]
Notes of Decisions
Evelyn M. Todd v. Robert A. McDonald, 27 Vet. App. 79 (Vet. App. 2014).
· cites it 2× “§§ 3100-3122 ; 38 C.F.R. § 21.1 et seq. (2014). The purpose of VA vocational rehabilitation and employment programs is “to provide for all services and assistance necessary to enable veterans with service-connected disabilities to achieve maximum independence in daily living…”
Groves v. McDonough, 34 F.4th 1074 (Fed. Cir. 2022).
“§ 3100 ; 38 C.F.R. §§ 21.1 (a), 21.70. Case: 21-2081 Document: 41 Page: 3 Filed: 05/17/2022 GROVES v.”
Wing v. West, 11 Vet. App. 98 (Vet. App. 1998).
· cites it 3× “Relevant Regulations Three “basic requirements” for eligibility for chapter 31 vocational rehabilitation training are set out in 38 C.F.R. § 21.1 (b) (1997). The first requirement is that of a basic entitlement to services under 38 C.”
Groves v. McDonough (Fed. Cir. 2022).
“§ 3100 ; 38 C.F.R. §§ 21.1 (a), 21.70. Case: 21-2081 Document: 41 Page: 3 Filed: 05/17/2022 GROVES v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.