38 C.F.R. § 3.329

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1987–2012 · leading case: Kiersey v. Dept. Of Vets. Affairs, 486 F. App'x 114 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
Kiersey v. Dept. Of Vets. Affairs, 486 F. App'x 114 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “” 38 C.F.R. § 3.329 (1978). Section 3.158(b) provided that “[wjhere the veteran fails without adequate reason to respond to an order to report for Veterans Administration examination within 1 year from the date of request and payments have been discontinued, the claim for such…”
Zayas v. Vets. Admin., 666 F. Supp. 361 (D.P.R. 1987). “655, only if the VA affords the veteran an opportunity to explain a failure to attend an appointment under 38 C.F.R. 3.329 before reducing benefits.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.