39 C.F.R. § 230.3

Cooperation with the Office of Inspector General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) All Postal Service employees shall cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General. Deliberately submitting information known to be false or misleading to the Office of Inspector General or failing to cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General may be grounds for disciplinary or other legal action.

(b) Any employee who has authority to take, direct another to take, recommend or approve any personnel action shall not retaliate against any employee as a reprisal for cooperating and assisting with any Office of Inspector General audit, review, or investigation (including reporting facts or information to the Office of Inspector General that leads to any audit, review, or investigation).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2014–2020 · leading case: State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 6961 (Ohio 2020).
State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 6961 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 2× “2014)] (noting that “Goodpaster was subject to a regulation * * * requiring that he ‘cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General’ ”), quoting 39 C.F.R. 230.3(a). R.C. 4731.22(B) puts licensees on notice that their failure…”
State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5635 (Ohio 2020). · cites it 2× “2014)] (noting that “Goodpaster was subject to a regulation * * * requiring that he ‘cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General’ ”), quoting 39 C.F.R. 230.3(a). R.C. 4731.22(B) puts licensees on notice that their failure…”
State v. Gideon, 2019 Ohio 2482 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “8 Compare Goodpaster at 1029 (noting that "Goodpaster was subject to a regulation * * * requiring that he 'cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General' "), quoting 39 C.F.R. 230.3(a). R.C. 4731.22(B) puts licensees on…”
United States v. Goodpaster, 65 F. Supp. 3d 1016 (D. Or. 2014). “Application In this case, Goodpaster was sub-' ject to a regulation, 39 C.F.R. § 230.3 (a), requiring that he “cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General.”
— 39 C.F.R. § 230.3(a) — 3 cases
State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 6961 (Ohio 2020). “2014)] (noting that “Goodpaster was subject to a regulation * * * requiring that he ‘cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General’ ”), quoting 39 C.F.R. 230.3(a). R.C. 4731.22(B) puts licensees on notice that their failure…”
State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 5635 (Ohio 2020). “2014)] (noting that “Goodpaster was subject to a regulation * * * requiring that he ‘cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General’ ”), quoting 39 C.F.R. 230.3(a). R.C. 4731.22(B) puts licensees on notice that their failure…”
State v. Gideon, 2019 Ohio 2482 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “8 Compare Goodpaster at 1029 (noting that "Goodpaster was subject to a regulation * * * requiring that he 'cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General' "), quoting 39 C.F.R. 230.3(a). R.C. 4731.22(B) puts licensees on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.