C.F.R. » Title 39 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE › SUBCHAPTER D—ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION › PART 255—ACCESS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES TO POSTAL SERVICE PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES, FACILITIES, AND ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

39 C.F.R. § 255.5

Employment

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment with the Postal Service. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1614 shall apply to employment within the Postal Service.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2024 · leading case: Mary Christine Smith v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster Gen., United States Postal Serv., 376 F.3d 529 (6th Cir. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mary Christine Smith v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster Gen., United States Postal Serv., 376 F.3d 529 (6th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “§ 791 (g) (providing that complaints of nonaffirmative action disability discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act are governed by the standards under Title I of the ADA); 39 C.F.R. § 255.5 (USPS Rehabilitation Act regulation that adopts by reference the EEOC’s ADA regulations…”
Kelvin D. Peebles v. John E. Potter, 1 Postmaster Gen., United States Postal Serv., 354 F.3d 761 (8th Cir. 2004). “See 39 C.F.R. § 255.5 (2003) (Postal Service regulation stating EEOC regulations contained in 29 C.”
Teal v. Potter, 559 F.3d 687 (7th Cir. 2009). “§ 794 ; 39 C.F.R. § 255.5 . Individuals who have suffered discrimination can seek relief pursuant to the procedures and requirements outlined in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which include exhausting administrative remedies prior to bringing suit.”
Jarvis v. Potter, 500 F.3d 1113 (10th Cir. 2007). “See 39 C.F.R. § 255.5 (2007) (EEOC regulations contained in 29 C.”
Thomas v. DeJoy, No. 2:23-cv-00397 (D. Nev. May 15, 2024). “See 39 C.F.R. § 255.5 (“No qualified individual with a disability shall, on 11 the basis of disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment with the Postal 12 Service.”
Robinson v. Potter, 394 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (D.S.D. 2005). “2(j)(3)(i); see 39 C.F.R. § 255.5 (Postal Service regulation stating EEOC regulations contained in 29 C.”
Smith v. United States Postal, No. 02-6073 (6th Cir. July 15, 2004). “The essential functions changed from “for cause” to “at-will”; plaintiff’s managerial means the “fundamental job duties” of the position, not responsibilities were reduced; and his base salary was “marginal functions.” Id. § 1630.2(n). reduced). But this case is not the typical…”
Joanne Teal v. John Potter, No. 07-2359 (7th Cir. Mar. 20, 2009). “§ 794 ; 39 C.F.R. § 255.5 . Individu- als who have suffered discrimination can seek relief pursuant to the procedures and requirements outlined in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which include ex- hausting administrative remedies prior to bringing suit.”
Kelvin D. Peebles v. William Henderson, No. 03-1466 (8th Cir. Jan. 8, 2004). “See 39 C.F.R. § 255.5 (2003) (Postal Service regulation stating EEOC regulations contained in 29 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.