39 C.F.R. § 3.1

Composition and responsibilities of Board

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The composition of the Board is described in 39 U.S.C. 202. The Board directs the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service, reviews the practices and policies of the Postal Service, and directs and controls the expenditures of the Postal Service. Consistent with the broad delegation of authority to the Postmaster General in § 3.5 of these bylaws, and except for those powers, duties, or obligations which are specifically vested by statute in the Governors, as distinguished from the Board of Governors, the Board accomplishes its purposes by monitoring the operations and performance of the Postal Service, and by establishing basic objectives, broad policies, and long-range goals for the Postal Service.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1959–1968 · leading case: Marvin Lustiger v. United States, 386 F.2d 132 (9th Cir. 1968).
Marvin Lustiger v. United States, 386 F.2d 132 (9th Cir. 1968). “We must therefore assume, as the Government represents, that at the hearing the Government asserted that Lustiger’s mail had not been delayed, and that this was conceded by Lustiger’s counsel at the hearing. It is also to be noted that the affidavit filed in support of the…”
United States v. Schwartz, 176 F. Supp. 613 (E.D. Pa. 1959). “” 39 C.F.R. § 3.1 (Supp.1959). *615 2) “The return address of the sender must be shown on the address side of mail to secure its return * * Postal Manual, Part 158.”
United States v. Buchhorn, 15 C.M.A. 556 (1965). “39 CFR § 3.1 . Referring to the propriety of alleging ownership in the addressee in an indictment charging theft from the mail, the court in United States v Jones, 31 Fed 725, 726 (SD Ga) (1887), said: “.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.