C.F.R. » Title 39 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE › SUBCHAPTER A—THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE › PART 3—BOARD OF GOVERNORS (ARTICLE III)

39 C.F.R. § 3.9

Establishment of rates and classes of competitive products of general applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This section relates to changes in rates or classes of competitive products of general applicability.

(a) Prior to establishing changes in rates or classes of competitive products of general applicability, postal management shall furnish to the Governors the following:

(1) The proposed rate and classification changes; and

(2) Management analysis demonstrating compliance with the standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).

(b) Pursuant to § 6.6(f) of these bylaws, the Governors shall issue a written decision on any changes in rates or classes of competitive products of general applicability, which shall include a statement as to when the decision becomes effective.

(c) The Secretary shall certify that the vote of the Governors met the condition set forth in section 6.6(f) of these bylaws.

(d) The Secretary shall cause the decision of the Governors and its attached analysis, along with the record of the Governors' proceedings in connection with such decision, to be published in the Federal Register at least 30 days before the effective date of the changes in rates or classes of competitive products of general applicability. The record of the proceedings of the Governors consists of the certification by the Secretary of the vote of the Governors.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1975–1976 · leading case: Nat'l Ass'n of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Serv., 569 F.2d 570 (D.C. Cir. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Ass'n of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Serv., 569 F.2d 570 (D.C. Cir. 1976). “§ 402 , and the Board has delegated some of its authority, see 39 C.F.R. § 3.9 (1975). Subparagraph eight is a specific reservation from that delegation.”
Associated Third Class Mail Users v. United States Postal Serv., 405 F. Supp. 1109 (D.D.C. 1975). “The Board, although delegating some power to the Postmaster General through its By-Laws ( 39 C.F.R. § 3.9 ), has certainly withheld any delegation of its authority to request recommended decisions by the Commission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.