40 C.F.R. § 265.115

Certification of closure

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Within 60 days of completion of closure of each hazardous waste surface impoundment, waste pile, land treatment, and landfill unit, and within 60 days of completion of final closure, the owner or operator must submit to the Regional Administrator, by registered mail, a certification that the hazardous waste management unit or facility, as applicable, has been closed in accordance with the specifications in the approved closure plan. The certification must be signed by the owner or operator and by a qualified Professional Engineer. Documentation supporting the Professional Engineer's certification must be furnished to the Regional Administrator upon request until he releases the owner or operator from the financial assurance requirements for closure under § 265.143(h).

[71 FR 16909, Apr. 4, 2006]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1989–2015 · leading case: Am. Iron & Steel Inst. v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, Am. Petroleum Inst., Edison Elec. Inst., Intervenors, 886 F.2d 390 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Am. Iron & Steel Inst. v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, Am. Petroleum Inst., Edison Elec. Inst., Intervenors, 886 F.2d 390 (D.C. Cir. 1989). · cites it 3× “At issue, in substance, is the EPA’s imposition of post-closure permitting requirements on facilities that ceased receiving wastes before July 26, 1982 but failed to certify final closure to the EPA, as set out in 40 CFR § 265.115 , until after January 26, 1983.”

Schmucker v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 90 F. Supp. 3d 786 (N.D. Ind. 2015). · cites it 2× “” 40 C.F.R. § 265.115 . In arguing that Johnson Controls has violated its closure obligations, however, Plaintiffs do not identify any particular deficiency by Johnson Controls as to any one of these requirements.”

USG Corp. v. Brown, 809 F. Supp. 573 (N.D. Ill. 1992). “40 CFR § 265.115 . AMC submitted a written closure plan for the surface impoundments to the Ohio EPA (“OEPA”) on November 15, 1982.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.