40 C.F.R. § 60.692-4
Standards: Aggregate facility
A new, modified, or reconstructed aggregate facility shall comply with the requirements of §§ 60.692-2 and 60.692-3.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2012–2015 · leading case: United States v. CITGO Petroleum Corp., 801 F.3d 477 (5th Cir. 2015).
United States v. CITGO Petroleum Corp., 801 F.3d 477 (5th Cir. 2015). “§ 7413 (c)(1), and 40 C.F.R. § 60.692-4 . 3 Id. Because the government suspected birds had died in the uncovered tanks, the indictment also accused CITGO of “taking” migratory birds in violation of the MBTA, 16 U.”
United States v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 893 F. Supp. 2d 841 (S.D. Tex. 2012). “§§ 7413 (c)(1) & 7411(e); 40 C.F.R. § 60.692-4 . CITGO now moves the Court to vacate its convictions under the MTBA on the grounds that the Government’s Indictment fails to state an offense.”
United States v. CITGO Petroleum Corp. (5th Cir. 2015). “§ 7413 (c)(1), and 40 C.F.R. § 60.692-4 . 3 Id. Because the government suspected birds had died in the uncovered tanks, the indictment also accused CITGO of “taking” migratory birds in violation of the MBTA, 16 U.”
United States v. CITGO Petroleum Corp. (5th Cir. 2015). “§ 7413 (c)(1), and 40 C.F.R. § 60.692-4 . 3 Id. Because the government suspected birds had died in the uncovered tanks, the indictment also accused CITGO of “taking” migratory birds in violation of the MBTA, 16 U.”
United States v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 908 F. Supp. 2d 812 (S.D. Tex. 2012). “§§ 7413 (c)(1), 7411(e) and 40 C.F.R. § 60.692-4 . Following a separate bench trial, the CITGO entities were convicted on July 17, 2007 on three misdemeanor counts each of unlawfully taking and aiding and abetting the taking of migratory birds in violation of the Migratory Bird…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.