40 C.F.R. § 7.10

Purpose of this part

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part implements: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; and section 13 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-500, (collectively, the Acts).

[75 FR 31707, June 4, 2010]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1997–2001 · leading case: South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot., 145 F. Supp. 2d 505 (D.N.J. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot., 145 F. Supp. 2d 505 (D.N.J. 2001). · cites it 5× “§ 2000d-l, and the EPA’s implementing regulations thereto, codified at 40 C.F.R. § 7.10 et seq., by failing to consider the potential adverse, disparate impact of their decision to grant St.”

South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot., 145 F. Supp. 2d 446 (D.N.J. 2001). · cites it 5× “For the reasons I shall now set forth, this Court rejects Defendants’ proposed interpretation of the NJDEP’s obligations under 40 C.F.R. § 7.10 et seq., the EPA’s implementing regulations to Title VI.”

Chester Residents Concerned for Quality Living v. Seif, 132 F.3d 925 (3rd Cir. 1997). “; 2 (2) the EPA’s civil rights regulations, 40 C.F.R. § 7.10 et seq., promulgated pursuant to section 602 of Title VI; 3 and (3) PADEP’s assur- *928 anee pursuant to the regulations that it would not violate the regulations.”

South Camden Citizens v. New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot., 274 F.3d 771 (3rd Cir. 2001). “The regulations are set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 7.10 et seq. and require the defendants to consider the potentially adverse disparate impact of air permits that St.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.