C.F.R. » Title 40 » CHAPTER I—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY › SUBCHAPTER R—TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT › PART 702—GENERAL PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES › Subpart B—Procedures for Chemical Substance Risk Evaluations

40 C.F.R. § 702.49

Publicly available information

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

For each risk evaluation, EPA will maintain a public docket at https://www.regulations.gov to provide public access to the following information, as applicable for that risk evaluation:

(a) The draft scope, final scope, draft risk evaluation, and final risk evaluation;

(b) All notices, determinations, findings, consent agreements, and orders;

(c) Any information required to be provided to EPA under 15 U.S.C. 2603;

(d) A nontechnical summary of the risk evaluation;

(e) A list of the studies, with the results of the studies, considered in carrying out each risk evaluation;

(f) Any final peer review report, including the response to peer review and public comments received during peer review;

(g) Response to public comments received on the draft scope and the draft risk evaluation; and

(h) Where unreasonable risk to workers is identified via inhalation, EPA's calculation of a risk-based occupational exposure value.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2019–2019 · leading case: Safer Chem Healthy Families v. Usepa (9th Cir. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Safer Chem Healthy Families v. Usepa (9th Cir. 2019). · cites it 4× “40 C.F.R. § 702.49 (d). Petitioners interpret these provisions to mean that EPA plans to conduct use-by-use risk determinations and to declare the safety of individual uses of a chemical standing alone, without first considering whether its conditions of use, viewed together,…”
Safer Chem Healthy Families v. Usepa (9th Cir. 2019). · cites it 4× “40 C.F.R. § 702.49 (d). Petitioners interpret these provisions to mean that EPA plans to conduct use-by-use risk determinations and to declare the safety of individual uses of a chemical standing alone, without first considering whether its conditions of use, viewed together,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.