C.F.R. » Title 40 » CHAPTER I—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY › SUBCHAPTER C—AIR PROGRAMS › PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES › Subpart D—Identification of Mandatory Class I Federal Areas Where Visibility Is an Important Value

40 C.F.R. § 81.415

Minnesota

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Area nameAcreagePublic Law establishingFederal land manager
Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wild747,84099-577USDA-FS
Voyageurs NP114,96499-261USDI-NPS
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Michigan v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 581 F.3d 524 (7th Cir. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Michigan v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 581 F.3d 524 (7th Cir. 2009). “In addition, as Michigan knows from its experience with nearby Class I areas, such as the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Minnesota, 40 C.F.R. § 81.415 , and the Seney Wilderness Area in Michigan’s own Upper Peninsula, 40 C.”
State of Michigan v. Env't Prot. Agenc (7th Cir. 2009). “In addition, as Michigan knows from its experience with nearby Class I areas, such as the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Minnesota, 40 C.F.R. § 81.415 , and the Seney Wilderness Area in Michigan’s own Upper Peninsula, 40 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.