40 C.F.R. § 82.17

Apportionment of baseline production allowances for class II controlled substances

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The following persons are apportioned baseline production allowances for HCFC-22, HCFC-141b, HCFC-142b, HCFC-123, HCFC-124, HCFC-225ca, and HCFC-225cb as set forth in the following table:

Person	Controlled substance	Allowances (kg)
AGC Chemicals Americas	HCFC-225ca	266,608
	HCFC-225cb	373,952
Arkema	HCFC-22	46,692,336
	HCFC-141b	24,647,925
	HCFC-142b	484,369
DuPont	HCFC-22	42,638,049
	HCFC-124	2,269,210
Honeywell	HCFC-22	37,378,252
	HCFC-141b	28,705,200
	HCFC-142b	2,417,534
	HCFC-124	1,759,681
MDA Manufacturing	HCFC-22	2,383,835
Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC	HCFC-142b	6,541,764

[79 FR 64287, Oct. 28, 2014]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Arkema Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 618 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Arkema Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 618 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “The Proposed Rule stated the EPA was proposing to apportion company-specific baselines in amounts equivalent to the existing baselines published in the 2003 Rule, see 40 C.F.R. §§ 82.17 (2003) (apportionment of baseline production allowances), 82.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.