41 C.F.R. § 102-3.145
Policies for subcommittee meetings
If a subcommittee provides advice or recommendations directly to a Federal officer or agency, or if its advice or recommendations will be adopted by the parent advisory committee without further deliberations by the parent advisory committee, then the subcommittee's meetings must be conducted in accordance with the requirements of this subpart.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2019–2021 · leading case: W. Org. Councils v. Bernhardt, 362 F. Supp. 3d 900 (D. Mont. 2019).
W. Org. Councils v. Bernhardt, 362 F. Supp. 3d 900 (D. Mont. 2019). “, or "[i]f a subcommittee makes recommendations directly to a Federal officer or agency, or if its recommendations will be adopted by the parent advisory committee without further deliberations by the parent advisory committee," 41 C.F.R. § 102-3.145 . Western first alleges that…”
Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. Drone Advisory Comm., 369 F. Supp. 3d 27 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “35 ; see also 41 C.F.R. § 102-3.145 (noting that subcommittee meetings must be open to the public when "a subcommittee makes recommendations directly to a Federal officer or agency, or if its recommendations will be adopted by the parent advisory committee without further…”
W. Org. of Resource Councils v. Brouillette (D. Mont. 2021). “” 41 C.F.R. 102-3.145. In such instances, the subcommittee must conduct its meetings “in accordance with all openness requirements.”
Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. Drone Advisory Comm. (D.D.C. 2019). “35 ; see also 41 C.F.R. § 102-3.145 (noting that subcommittee meetings must be open to the public when “a subcommittee makes recommendations directly to a Federal officer or agency, or if its recommendations will be adopted by the parent advisory committee without further…”
Nat'l Ass'n of Consum. Advocates v. Kraninger (D. Mass. 2021). “2 § 10, 41 C.F.R. § 102-3.145 ; (3) failure to disclose advisory committee materials in a manner that provides for meaningful public participation in violation of 5 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.