C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER V—OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL-HEALTH CARE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER B—OIG AUTHORITIES › PART 1001—PROGRAM INTEGRITY—MEDICARE AND STATE HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS › Subpart F—Reinstatement into the Programs

42 C.F.R. § 1001.3003

Approval of request for reinstatement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If the OIG grants a request for reinstatement, the OIG will—

(1) Give written notice to the excluded individual or entity specifying the date of reinstatement;

(2) Notify CMS of the date of the individual's or entity's reinstatement;

(3) Notify appropriate Federal and State agencies that administer health care programs that the individual or entity has been reinstated into all Federal health care programs; and

(4) To the extent applicable, give notice to others that were originally notified of the exclusion.

(b) A determination by the OIG to reinstate an individual or entity has no effect if a Federal health care program has imposed a longer period of exclusion under its own authorities.

[64 FR 39428, July 22, 1999]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–1995 · leading case: Leonard R. FRIEDMAN, M.D., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Et Al., Defendant, Appellee, 46 F.3d 115 (1st Cir. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Leonard R. FRIEDMAN, M.D., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Et Al., Defendant, Appellee, 46 F.3d 115 (1st Cir. 1995). “See 42 C.F.R. § 1001.3003 (a)(4). Presumably, therefore, public notice of Friedman’s reinstatement was given, although it is not clear whether the notice would have given the reason for his reinstatement.”
Friedman v. Shalala (1st Cir. 1995). “See 42 C.F.R. 1001.3003(a)(4). Presumably, therefore, public notice of Friedman's reinstatement was given, although it is not clear whether the notice would have given the reason for his reinstatement.”
Friedman v. Shalala (1st Cir. 1995). “See 42 C.F.R. 1001.3003(a)(4). Presumably, ___ therefore, public notice of Friedman's reinstatement was given, although it is not clear whether the notice would have given the reason for his reinstatement.”
— 42 C.F.R. § 1001.3003(a)(4) — 2 cases
Friedman v. Shalala (1st Cir. 1995). “See 42 C.F.R. 1001.3003(a)(4). Presumably, therefore, public notice of Friedman's reinstatement was given, although it is not clear whether the notice would have given the reason for his reinstatement.”
Friedman v. Shalala (1st Cir. 1995). “See 42 C.F.R. 1001.3003(a)(4). Presumably, ___ therefore, public notice of Friedman's reinstatement was given, although it is not clear whether the notice would have given the reason for his reinstatement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.