42 C.F.R. § 430.104

Decisions that affect FFP

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Scope of decisions. If the Administrator concludes that withholding of FFP is necessary because a State is out of compliance with Federal requirements, in accordance with § 430.35, the decision also specifies—

(1) Whether no further payments will be made to the State or whether payments will be limited to parts of the program not affected by the noncompliance; and

(2) The effective date of the decision to withhold.

(b) Consultation. The Administrator may ask the parties for recommendations or briefs or may hold conferences of the parties on the question of further payments to the State.

(c) Effective date of decision. The effective date of a decision to withhold Federal funds will not be earlier than the date of the Administrator's decision and will not be later than the first day of the next calendar quarter. The provisions of this section may not be waived under § 430.64.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: State of Tenn. v. United States Dep't of State, 931 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2019).
State of Tenn. v. United States Dep't of State, 931 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2019). “42 C.F.R. 430.104(a). CMS may still, however, consult with the parties on the question of further payments.”
— 42 C.F.R. § 430.104(a) — 1 case
State of Tenn. v. United States Dep't of State, 931 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2019). “42 C.F.R. 430.104(a). CMS may still, however, consult with the parties on the question of further payments.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.