42 C.F.R. § 431.202

State plan requirements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A State plan must provide that the requirements of §§ 431.205 through 431.246 of this subpart are met.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1989–2019 · leading case: Prunckun v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs. Oldham v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs., 201 A.3d 525 (Del. 2019).
Prunckun v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs. Oldham v. Delaware Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs., 201 A.3d 525 (Del. 2019). “, 42 C.F.R. § 431.202 ("A State plan must provide that the requirements of §§ 431.”
Frank v. Kizer, 213 Cal. App. 3d 919 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989). “” ( 42 C.F.R. § 431.202 .) The notice and evidentiary hearing provisions were adopted in response to the due process standards announced in Goldberg v.”
French v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 920 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). “See 42 C.F.R. § 431.202 ; Kurnik v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab.”
Paschall v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Health, 871 A.2d 463 (D.C. 2005). “See also 42 C.F.R. § 431.202 ("A state plan must provide that the requirements of §§ 431.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.